Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Conflict Management Styles

Following an emplyee "satisfaction" survey issues surfaced about percieved favoritism, and unfair promotional practices. The department manager who had an authoritarian, style that was percieved as cold and efficient, convened a "communication team" to address these issues. Employees were informed that they had been designated to participate by email, but had no input about agenda items, team structure or processes. At the first meeting we were presented with a list of agenda items such as improving the department morale, increasing motivation, and resolving any tensions that inhibit the smooth functioning of the department. The group would have 4 one hour sessions to devise solutions to these problems and plans to implement them. After the manager walked out, there was stunned silence. Needless to say, this dominant conflict management style (p. 291) was not conducive to resolving the overarching and fundamental issues we were tasked with. Because the outcome was a forgone conclusion, the group fell apart in a few weeks, as issued continued to simmer under the surface.

1 comment:

zamoradesign said...

What I find interesting, after reading the text; after posting my own experiences with the lack of tact in managing conflict; there seems to be a lot of poorly managed organizations out there. At least I'm seeing issues of poor leadership, less than impressive communications, and menial management styles.

Are companies and organizations not being run by individuals who have ben exposed to Organizational Communications courses like these? The theories and strategies being delivered to us in the text seem to be very clear and obvious. Do we leave our textbook out and open it to a specific page and walk away?